Opinion: The Case for Better Conversations
By Tanya Lewis
We can disagree without turning every difference into a performance. The work begins with listening past the headline.
Somewhere along the way, disagreement became performance. The goal stopped being to understand and started being to win — or at least to be seen winning. Social media accelerated this, but it didn't invent it.
The cost is real. When every conversation is a battle, we stop learning from each other. We stop updating our views. We stop being curious about why someone sees the world differently than we do.
Better conversations aren't about being nicer or avoiding hard topics. They're about being genuinely interested in the person across from you. What do they know that you don't? What have they experienced that shaped their view? What would it take to change your mind?
That last question is the most important one. If the answer is "nothing," you're not having a conversation — you're giving a speech. And speeches, however passionate, rarely change anyone.
Share this article